Do we all have to be “leftists”? A dialogue about antagonism and agonism in music education research

Authors

  • Øivind Varkøy Norwegian Academy of Music and Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway
  • Petter Dyndahl Inland University of Applied Sciences, Norway
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23865/nrme.v3.3697

Abstract

In this article, the tension between diversity and uniformity in our music education research communities is discussed as it relates to Thomas Piketty’s research on elites and shifting political leanings, Francis Fukuyama’s and Judith Butler’s reflections on identity politics, and Chantal Mouffe’s critical discussion of an antagonistic way of thinking, in which opponents are not defined politically but, rather, morally. We must establish an agonistic public sphere, Mouffe argues, a political sphere characterised by fights in which different political projects confront one another, accepting the fact that identity is relational. The article is the result of a series of ongoing dialogues between the authors and offered as an attempt at agonistic turn-taking that clearly identifies the two voices involved and their respective views.

Usage Statistics
Total downloads:
Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Øivind Varkøy, Norwegian Academy of Music and Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway

Professor of music education and musicology, and visiting professor in music

Petter Dyndahl, Inland University of Applied Sciences, Norway

Professor of musicology, music education and general education

Published

2022-10-10

How to Cite

Varkøy, Øivind, & Dyndahl, P. (2022). Do we all have to be “leftists”? A dialogue about antagonism and agonism in music education research. Nordic Research in Music Education, 3, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.23865/nrme.v3.3697

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Keywords:

music education, diversity, uniformity, antagonism, agonism, identity politics